Documented Incident
Records Show Virginia Officials Relied on Flock Scripts as Residents Pressed for Answers
First reported: September 1, 2026 · 5 sources
The Virginia Center for Investigative Journalism at WHRO reviewed thousands of records from Norfolk, Alexandria, Mecklenburg and Fairfax obtained through public records requests, finding local officials and police often lacked basic information about how Flock Safety license plate reader data is collected, shared and stored. In one exchange, the College of William & Mary police chief asked Flock how data is shared and received a set of scripted talking points he was told he could forward as-is; a university spokesperson said leaning on the vendor's expertise is standard practice. Records also show Alexandria's mayor pressing city staff for answers about the city's 67 cameras, and Bridgewater officials declining to respond to reporter inquiries before later seeking answers from Virginia State Police.
The records offer a documented look at how surveillance contracts can be adopted and defended with vendor-supplied messaging rather than independent local review, a dynamic relevant to any jurisdiction weighing ALPR deployment and oversight rules.
Key facts
- Virginia State Police's 2025 ALPR report lists at least 159 law enforcement agencies using ALPRs statewide, including 139 using Flock Safety.
- A Flock training document, "How to Speak to City Councils About Public Safety Technology," advises agencies not to try to persuade opponents that the technology isn't mass surveillance and to emphasize local crime and quality-of-life needs instead.
- The Institute for Justice sued Norfolk in 2024 alleging Flock's continuous vehicle-movement collection is a warrantless search under the Fourth Amendment; a federal judge rejected that claim in January.
- VCIJ previously reported that data from Bridgewater's five cameras had been accessed more than 7 million times nationwide before Virginia barred out-of-state sharing.
- Norfolk, Newport News and Virginia Beach told advocate Clayton Tye they do not track how Flock data is used in criminal cases; a Norfolk police spokesman said the cameras aided two shooting investigations since March.
- Flock spokesperson Holly Beilin declined to comment.
Sources
This summary was written from the published reporting below and links to it; BlockFlockNow does not reproduce article text.
- Inside Virginia’s City Halls, Concerns, Confusion Rise with Flock Surveillance Protests (9-2-2026) (Royal Examiner, September 1, 2026)
- Inside Virginia’s city halls, concerns, confusion rise with Flock surveillance protests (virginiamercury.com, September 1, 2026)
- Inside Virginia’s city halls, concerns, confusion rise with Flock surveillance protests (Dnronline, September 2, 2026)
- Inside Virginia’s city halls, concerns, confusion rise with Flock surveillance protests (The Alexandria Brief, September 1, 2026)
- Inside Virginia’s city halls, concerns, confusion rise with Flock surveillance protests (News From The States, September 1, 2026)
More from Virginia
Everything we have documented in Virginia, or search every Virginia article in the archive.
About this record
BlockFlockNow documents reported incidents involving Flock Safety cameras and automated license plate readers: council votes, contract decisions, misuse by authorized users, lawsuits, audits, and community response. Every record is reviewed by a person before publication. New to the topic? Start with What is Flock?, find meetings near you, or learn how to request your town's camera records.
Updated September 3, 2026. Corrections: blockflock@bytebunny.io. See all documented incidents or search the full article archive.