Documented Incident

Cities RejectingPrivacyPublic OppositionVandalismTennessee

Tennessee communities split on Flock cameras as Sullivan County votes against contract renewal

Sullivan County commissioners voted not to renew the county's Flock Safety contract, which expires in January, days after Commissioner Joe Carr made incendiary remarks about the company's CEO at a public meeting. Anderson County scheduled a September town hall on its cameras, while Blount and Carter counties continue to partner with Flock and Johnson City operates 145 license plate readers and 145 pan/tilt/zoom cameras under a 10-year contract signed in 2025. Officials in Blount County and Johnson City defended the technology as an investigative tool, while local DeFlock organizers and some residents argue the networked cameras amount to mass surveillance.

Why this matters

Tennessee's patchwork of renewals, cancellations and pending reviews shows how ALPR decisions are being made county by county, with little shared standard for oversight or public input.

Key facts

Sources

This summary was written from the published reporting below and links to it; BlockFlockNow does not reproduce article text.

More from Tennessee

Everything we have documented in Tennessee, or search every Tennessee article in the archive.

About this record

BlockFlockNow documents reported incidents involving Flock Safety cameras and automated license plate readers: council votes, contract decisions, misuse by authorized users, lawsuits, audits, and community response. Every record is reviewed by a person before publication. New to the topic? Start with What is Flock?, find meetings near you, or learn how to request your town's camera records.

Updated September 9, 2026. Corrections: blockflock@bytebunny.io. See all documented incidents or search the full article archive.