Documented Incident

InvestigationsPolice MisuseAuditsData SharingMassachusetts

Swampscott Police Have No Flock-Specific ALPR Policy as Misuse Investigation Continues

The Swampscott Tides reviewed department records showing the Swampscott Police Department has no policy specifically governing Flock Safety technology, relying instead on a 2015 ALPR policy reviewed in 2023 that was written for its own cruiser-mounted system, which the department says has been non-functional for roughly five years. On September 4, the department announced it was investigating whether an employee violated department policies or other standards and placed the officer on paid administrative leave. The department said Swampscott does not contract with Flock or host cameras, but that authorized personnel may use Flock readers operated by partner communities, described as being used strictly for active investigations. The specific nature of the alleged misuse has not been disclosed.

Why this matters

The case raises questions about whether written policies keep pace with agencies' access to surveillance networks they do not own, and how oversight applies when officers search another community's Flock system.

Key facts

Timeline

Sources

This summary was written from the published reporting below and links to it; BlockFlockNow does not reproduce article text.

More from Massachusetts

Everything we have documented in Massachusetts, or search every Massachusetts article in the archive.

About this record

BlockFlockNow documents reported incidents involving Flock Safety cameras and automated license plate readers: council votes, contract decisions, misuse by authorized users, lawsuits, audits, and community response. Every record is reviewed by a person before publication. New to the topic? Start with What is Flock?, find meetings near you, or learn how to request your town's camera records.

Updated October 4, 2026. Corrections: blockflock@bytebunny.io. See all documented incidents or search the full article archive.