Documented Incident

Cities RejectingData SharingPrivacyPublic OppositionCalifornia

South Pasadena Ends One Flock Contract Early, Lets Second Expire, in 4–1 Council Vote

On Wednesday, March 18, the South Pasadena City Council voted 4–1 to end one of the city's two contracts with Flock Safety early and to let the second contract lapse five months later. Student newspaper Tiger reported that concerns about data sharing with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and out-of-state third parties, along with reported cases of cameras incorrectly flagging vehicles against hot lists, drove the decision. The city had leased 27 Flock cameras; 13 cameras near the city's perimeter remained operating while officials looked at replacement vendors, including a service identified in council discussions as PlateRanger. The article describes South Pasadena as the first city in Los Angeles County to discontinue its Flock contracts.

Why this matters

A city stepping away from an existing ALPR vendor over data-sharing and accuracy concerns offers other councils a template for mid-contract review, while the search for a replacement vendor shows that cancellation does not necessarily end license plate surveillance.

Key facts

Sources

This summary was written from the published reporting below and links to it; BlockFlockNow does not reproduce article text.

More from California

Everything we have documented in California, or search every California article in the archive.

About this record

BlockFlockNow documents reported incidents involving Flock Safety cameras and automated license plate readers: council votes, contract decisions, misuse by authorized users, lawsuits, audits, and community response. Every record is reviewed by a person before publication. New to the topic? Start with What is Flock?, find meetings near you, or learn how to request your town's camera records.

Updated October 19, 2026. Corrections: blockflock@bytebunny.io. See all documented incidents or search the full article archive.