Documented Incident

PrivacyData SharingCities RejectingPolice Misuse

Opinion Column Argues ALPR Backlash Should Extend Beyond Flock to Whole Surveillance Industry

An August 12, 2026 OtherWords commentary by Farrah Hassen argues that community campaigns against Flock Safety cameras, while significant, address only one vendor in a broader mass-surveillance market. The piece cites reported incidents including a Texas deputy's search of 83,000 Flock cameras to locate a woman who allegedly had an abortion, documented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and a Roseville, California police analysis finding 71 percent of Flock alerts incorrectly flagged vehicles. Hassen contends that cities canceling Flock contracts can simply switch to competitors such as Axon, Motorola Solutions, or Genetec, and calls for regulation of the surveillance industry and the agencies that buy its data.

Why this matters

The column frames a question facing local officials weighing ALPR contracts: whether vendor-specific cancellations achieve meaningful privacy protection, or whether durable limits require policy governing data retention, sharing, and warrant requirements regardless of which company supplies the cameras.

Key facts

Sources

This summary was written from the published reporting below and links to it; BlockFlockNow does not reproduce article text.

About this record

BlockFlockNow documents reported incidents involving Flock Safety cameras and automated license plate readers: council votes, contract decisions, misuse by authorized users, lawsuits, audits, and community response. Every record is reviewed by a person before publication. New to the topic? Start with What is Flock?, find meetings near you, or learn how to request your town's camera records.

Updated August 17, 2026. Corrections: blockflock@bytebunny.io. See all documented incidents or search the full article archive.