Documented Incident

Cities RejectingLegislationPrivacyOhio

Ironton, Ohio council member drafts ordinance barring city contracts with mass surveillance camera firms

Ironton City Councilman Troy Scott is drafting an ordinance that would bar the city from contracting with companies operating mass surveillance camera networks, including automated license plate readers such as those sold by Flock Safety. Scott said he pursued the measure preemptively, citing privacy, data security and the risk of residents being wrongly accused of crimes; the draft would not apply to private businesses. He said the proposal was discussed at a recent strategic planning meeting attended by Mayor Sam Cramblit, Police Chief Pam Wagner and other council members, and that a first reading was expected at the July 23 council meeting. The ordinance had not been enacted as of the report.

Why this matters

Most municipal ALPR debates begin after a system is already installed; Ironton's draft would act before any contract exists, and if passed it would be among the first explicit Ohio bans on such agreements.

Key facts

Sources

This summary was written from the published reporting below and links to it; BlockFlockNow does not reproduce article text.

More from Ohio

Everything we have documented in Ohio, or search every Ohio article in the archive.

About this record

BlockFlockNow documents reported incidents involving Flock Safety cameras and automated license plate readers: council votes, contract decisions, misuse by authorized users, lawsuits, audits, and community response. Every record is reviewed by a person before publication. New to the topic? Start with What is Flock?, find meetings near you, or learn how to request your town's camera records.

Updated August 10, 2026. Corrections: blockflock@bytebunny.io. See all documented incidents or search the full article archive.