Documented Incident
Flock announces privacy changes as Bay Area cities diverge on license plate readers
First reported: August 14, 2026 · 4 sources
Flock Safety said Thursday it would let individual police departments limit which outside agencies can view their data and would shorten the default data retention period from 30 days to one week, though agencies can adjust those settings. CEO Garrett Langley said the changes had been in development for months and that the company had "a responsibility to do more." The announcement came as Bay Area jurisdictions took sharply different paths: San Jose still runs nearly 500 cameras with tightened rules, while Mountain View, Los Altos Hills, Santa Clara County and El Cerrito have ended or barred Flock use. ACLU senior policy counsel Chad Marlow called shorter retention a positive step but said the local-control features are "good in theory" and unproven, arguing Flock is treating privacy as a public relations problem.
Flock's changes shift key privacy decisions to individual agencies, meaning protections may vary widely from city to city and rest on local policy rather than binding law. The Bay Area's split outcomes show how audits revealing unauthorized federal access have driven some councils to cancel contracts while neighbors expand them.
Key facts
- Flock says its network includes 120,000 cameras used by roughly 7,000 law enforcement agencies nationwide.
- New default retention drops from 30 days to one week; departments can change the setting.
- San Jose's City Council voted in March to cut default retention from one year to 30 days and bar capture near abortion clinics, gender-affirming care facilities, consulates, embassies and houses of worship; the system remains subject to state and federal lawsuits over warrantless surveillance.
- Mountain View ended its contract after an audit found unauthorized federal and other agency access; El Cerrito shut down its 40 readers in June and began removal in July after a similar audit finding.
- Oakland approved a two-year, $2.25 million contract in December and reported nearly 639 million plate reads in 2025; Alameda County extended a $2.4 million contract through December 2027.
Timeline
- August 14, 2026Flock announces privacy changes as Bay Area cities split over license plate cameras
- August 14, 2026Flock announces privacy changes as Bay Area cities split over license plate cameras
- August 14, 2026Flock announces privacy changes as Bay Area cities split over license plate cameras
Sources
This summary was written from the published reporting below and links to it; BlockFlockNow does not reproduce article text.
- Flock announces privacy changes as Bay Area cities split over license plate cameras (mercurynews.com, August 14, 2026)
- Flock announces privacy changes as Bay Area cities split over license plate cameras (siliconvalley.com, August 14, 2026)
- Flock announces privacy changes as Bay Area cities split over license plate cameras (eastbaytimes.com, August 14, 2026)
- Flock announces privacy changes as Bay Area cities split over license plate cameras (pressdemocrat.com, August 13, 2026)
More from California
Everything we have documented in California, or search every California article in the archive.
About this record
BlockFlockNow documents reported incidents involving Flock Safety cameras and automated license plate readers: council votes, contract decisions, misuse by authorized users, lawsuits, audits, and community response. Every record is reviewed by a person before publication. New to the topic? Start with What is Flock?, find meetings near you, or learn how to request your town's camera records.
Updated August 17, 2026. Corrections: blockflock@bytebunny.io. See all documented incidents or search the full article archive.