Documented Incident

Cities RejectingPolice MisusePrivacyData Sharing

Advocacy tally counts at least 56 U.S. localities dropping or rejecting Flock contracts in 2026

An aggregated report describes a widening set of U.S. cities and counties stepping back from Flock Safety's automated license plate reader cameras, citing privacy, data-sharing, and misuse concerns. The advocacy group DeFlock counted at least 56 cities and towns that deactivated, rejected, or canceled Flock contracts in 2026, though no central government registry tracks such local decisions. Recent departures include Tempe, Arizona, which switched off its system and said it would end its contract while stating it found no evidence of local misuse, and Texas jurisdictions including Pflugerville, Kendall County, and Hood County. Flock has announced additional safeguards; civil-liberties advocates say the changes do not address who authorizes searches.

Why this matters

The tally and the individual council votes offer other communities a record of how contract cancellations have been justified, and of the audit and data-sharing questions that preceded them. It also highlights that oversight of ALPR networks currently depends largely on internal agency policy rather than external review.

Key facts

Sources

This summary was written from the published reporting below and links to it; BlockFlockNow does not reproduce article text.

About this record

BlockFlockNow documents reported incidents involving Flock Safety cameras and automated license plate readers: council votes, contract decisions, misuse by authorized users, lawsuits, audits, and community response. Every record is reviewed by a person before publication. New to the topic? Start with What is Flock?, find meetings near you, or learn how to request your town's camera records.

Updated August 28, 2026. Corrections: blockflock@bytebunny.io. See all documented incidents or search the full article archive.